Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 13:04
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 152
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 434
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 104
0% 55.7 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 47.4
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.3 5.3 3.8 408 402 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 472
Write 412
Mixed 403
SusWrite 138
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 0.2
23% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
350GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45% Average
Read 80.6
Write 87.8
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 75.8
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback