Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 245 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 44.1 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 76.3 31% 51.4 Pts	4-Core 66.2 8-Core 74.9 9% 70.6 Pts	64-Core 66.4 4% 66.4 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 430GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 3.2 4.8 4.4 6.4 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 52.4 Write 50.2 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 7.5 28% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 64% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 70%
USB Flash Memory 32GB 520 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 16GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.7 4.2 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Read 16.1 Write 10 Mixed 6.4 SusWrite 3.7 11% 9.05 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 16% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KY996D-ELD Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-AE-F Nanya NT2GC64B8HA0NF-BE Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-G7 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.8% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 6.9 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 184 22% 184 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples	13x
Athlon II X2 240AMDBench 40%, 5,506 samples	11x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	10x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x

SSD
120GB 120GBAdroitlarkBench 86%, 73 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
BX300 120GBCrucial $42Bench 86%, 7,190 samples	3x

RAM
Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 6GBCT25664BD160BA.C16Bench 30%, 13 samples	4x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	2x
KTW149-ELD 4x1GBKingstonBench 32%, 276 samples	2x