Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7400QC_M7400QC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7400QC_M7400QC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M7400QC
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210825
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 12:19
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 123
2-Core 236
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 722
75% 602 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1AB2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.10
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 30
Parallax 15.7
8% 18.3 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 23.6
17% 20.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-1TM9PGN + 1TB
732GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 850 814 712 498 355 403 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 967
Write 950
Mixed 802
SusWrite 605
187% 831 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 40.2
123% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 502
348% 444 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 133%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 25.6
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 23
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7400QC_M7400QC Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7400QC_M7400QC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback