Today's hottest deals

Asrock H410M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 19:01
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 245
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 767
72% 596 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
Asus(1043 877F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.2% Very good
Lighting 88.7
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 82.2
72% 85.9 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 70.1
69% 87.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 240GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 182 93 66 123 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 433
Write 345
Mixed 191
SusWrite 129
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 13.5
38% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34.2
DQ Write 36.7
DQ Mixed 58.7
38% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 99%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
390GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 132 134 127 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 158
Write 146
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 129
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-HVS Builds (Compare 896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback