Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory16.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 17:01
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$161
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 72.1
1-Core 166
2-Core 329
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 967
99% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,291
80% 1,291 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 110
Parallax 107
85% 107 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 100
Splatting 0.3
46% 64.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0B 2TB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 167 170 148 174 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 463
Write 449
Mixed 189
SusWrite 181
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 28.1
143% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 140
148% 244 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
28GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 115 110 112 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 64.3
Mixed 68
SusWrite 111
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 114%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 124 125 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 123
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 124
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 100%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$243
1GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 162
Write 166
Mixed 95.6
105% 141 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1.7
404% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.5% Above average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 23.8
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 24.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback