Asrock H97M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141215
Uptime20.6 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 21:14
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 150
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 348
39% 308 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 33.6
29% 23.8 fps
MRender 32.1
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 29.9
26% 32 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 67 37 62 59 2.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.3% Very poor
Read 253
Write 155
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 58.3
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 2.3
5% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 129 142 144 146 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 142
Write 141
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 140
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M-ITX/ac - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback