TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro H8SGL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro H8SGL  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H8SGL
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 09:41
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 6376
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 101
41% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 286
28% 230 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 44.1%
 Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 570X
Dell(1028 1722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 57.4
Parallax 77.3
46% 63.7 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 42.7
43% 53.7 fps
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 45%
 Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M128C 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 93 99 98 103 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 207
Write 177
Mixed 180
SusWrite 95.7
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 13
78% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 16.6
22% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 39%
 Great: 96%
Seagate ST3500630NS 500GB-$53
465GB free
Firmware: 3BKS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 64
Write 71.6
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 75.9
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 40.2%
 Great: 43%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
466GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 102 101 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 172
Write 160
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 101
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 78.4%
 Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC72C4PG0NK-CG Micron 18KSF51272PZ-1G4M1 NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.9% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 36.9%
 Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H8SGL Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro H8SGL

CPU
Opteron 6376AMDBench 49%, 24 samples4x
Opteron 6380AMDBench 50%, 38 samples4x
Opteron 6328AMDBench 57%, 12 samples1x
GPU
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples1x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples1x
GTX 780Nvidia  $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples1x
SSD
JAJS600M128C 128GBBench 66%, 988 samples2x
MegaRAID SAS RMB 255GBLSIBench 76%, 2 samples2x
830 128GBSamsung  $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples1x
RAM
NT4GC72C4PG0NK-CG Micron 18KSF51272PZ-1G4M1 NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG 32GBNanyaBench 38%, 4 samples2x
M393B5170FH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 71%, 140 samples1x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynixBench 86%, 188 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback