Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 20:28
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 6-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 66.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
87% 166 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 850
85% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,096
68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 113
Parallax 128
101% 122 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 115
Splatting 105
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Twinmos SSD 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0202A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 284 105 133 115 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 473
Write 363
Mixed 330
SusWrite 178
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 21.9
115% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 31.5
83% 169 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 156%
Adata SU630 240GB
67GB free
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 135 23 6.3 31 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 500
Write 347
Mixed 343
SusWrite 92.5
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.4
43% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
56GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 88 89 87 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 79.7
Write 78.2
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 87.5
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback