Today's hottest deals

Asus P5G41C-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5G41C-M LX  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 16:41
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 85.8
44% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 84.6
8-Core 83.8
11% 84.2 Pts
64-Core 85.7
5% 85.7 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
Sapphire(174B BE42) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.4
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 4.9
3% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 194 207 203 216 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49% Average
Read 241
Write 221
Mixed 195
SusWrite 198
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 17.1
84% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 73.7
DQ Mixed 26.8
28% 45 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
203GB free
Firmware: 3.AAF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 93 98 94 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 77.3
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 94
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41C-M LX Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41C-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback