Today's hottest deals

HP p6-2120

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP p6-2120  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 01:54
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3620 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 70.9
40% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 138
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7950 GT
BFG(19F1 2207) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS13 11 240GB SSD
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 195 83 75 114 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.7% Above average
Read 258
Write 250
Mixed 211
SusWrite 142
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 25.2
95% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 132
110% 158 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030MM58E8F1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2120 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $22
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback