Today's hottest deals

IRU 525

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIRU 525  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B450M-HDV R4.0
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 05:48
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 262
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 796
77% 633 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$201
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.5% Good
Lighting 78.5
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 71.7
64% 75.6 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 61.4
60% 75.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 438
Mixed 11.2
68% 310 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 196 197 196 198 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 190
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 196
112% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 114%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 26.8
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 26.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 525 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: IRU 525

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback