Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200121
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '22 at 14:13
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	45%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 86.9 1-Core 119 2-Core 243 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 650 68% 545 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.1% Average	Lighting 55.2 Reflection 79.2 Parallax 47.4 45% 60.6 fps	MRender 41.7 Gravity 48.6 Splatting 43.8 37% 44.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37240G 240GB 1,214 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 357 373 334 330 234 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 400 Write 343 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 296 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 13.4 68% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 40.8 DQ Write 1.4 DQ Mixed 21.7 16% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 395GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 105 117 116 123 120 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 166 Write 142 Mixed 31 SusWrite 116 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905734-059.A00G 1x16GB 336 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.1% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 10.7 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 13.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	431x
Core i3-9100FIntel $112Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	365x
Core i5-9400Intel $134Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	152x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	120x
GTX 1650Nvidia $152Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	92x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	77x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	141x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	51x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $34Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	51x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $69Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	66x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $236

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $296	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350