Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17H3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
MotherboardMSI MS-17H3  (all builds)
Memory42.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 15:18
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$470
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 290
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,060
98% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,837
114% 1,837 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super Mobile)
MSI(1462 12AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 178
Parallax 177
139% 175 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 151
Splatting 129
125% 156 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1032 1TB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11111000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 983 990 914 953 932 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,007
Write 2,075
Mixed 1,209
SusWrite 923
296% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 54.6
177% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 668
503% 681 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 182%
Great: 322%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 26.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17H3 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17H3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback