Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '22 at 05:32
Run Duration	389 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 71.4 1-Core 148 2-Core 296 91% 172 Pts	4-Core 592 8-Core 1,192 105% 892 Pts	64-Core 1,192 74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2487) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (160 fps cap detected)	125% Outstanding	Lighting 160 Reflection 161 Parallax 158 131% 160 fps	MRender 161 Gravity 160 Splatting 159 131% 160 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 174%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 6,082 Write 9,363 Mixed 7,432 1,719% 7,626 MB/s	4K Read 463 4K Write 379 4K Mixed 402 1,417% 415 MB/s	DQ Read 1,848 DQ Write 1,437 DQ Mixed 1,524 1,172% 1,603 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 878GB free Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 776 404 388 401 400 385 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 86% Great: 123%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 902GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 429 432 429 429 434 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 466GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 6,125 Write 9206 Mixed 7,197 1,691% 7,509 MB/s	4K Read 516 4K Write 421 4K Mixed 461 1,596% 466 MB/s	DQ Read 1,961 DQ Write 1,563 DQ Mixed 1,638 1,260% 1,720 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
General UDisk 2GB 1,991 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 16.9 Write 4.7 Mixed 4.7 9% 8.77 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 39% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 4x8GB 345 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	MC Read 25 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 21.1 76% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 37.2 SC Mixed 22.2 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 120%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	186x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	166x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	150x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	114x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	112x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	103x

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $687

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16