Today's hottest deals

Asus X756UQK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X756UQK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X756UQK
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161019
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateOct 14 '17 at 20:12
Run Duration382 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 59%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 266
36% 266 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 14E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 6.12
5% 7.72 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 13.4
8% 8.89 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 512
Write 126
Mixed 170
58% 269 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 14.2
108% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 14.4
59% 135 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
552GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 87.1
Mixed 84.2
66% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.19
64% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 57%
Mass Storage Device 55GB
4GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.3% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 32.9
Mixed 33.9
43% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.58
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 1.46
120% 1.64 MB/s
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 3.71
Mixed 5.94
9% 8.65 MB/s
4K Read 7.27
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
28% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 21.7
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X756UQK Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X756UQK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback