Asus X751NA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X751NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X751NA
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 14:04
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 34.2
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 89.4
32% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 174
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Asus(1043 1770) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 4.3
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 334 328 338 346 352 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 402
Write 346
Mixed 347
SusWrite 330
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 12.9
79% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 49.6
90% 175 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unde i-DIMM 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X751NA Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X751NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $57
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback