Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C82
MotherboardMSI MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 20:48
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 150
2-Core 292
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,056
98% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,585
98% 1,585 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Sapphire(174B 1370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 81.4
Parallax 72.3
56% 74.3 fps
MRender 74.6
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 63
56% 69.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk G5 BICS4 500GB
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 207 201 210 211 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 414
Mixed 242
SusWrite 215
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 30.7
158% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 255
217% 318 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 105%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
86GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 127 128 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 474
Write 128
Mixed 126
SusWrite 126
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 20.4
126% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 48.8
83% 167 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 42B7T1KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1732 964 967 970 970 831 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,767
Write 2020
Mixed 1675
SusWrite 1,072
420% 1,884 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 82.4
292% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,333
DQ Write 927
DQ Mixed 578
581% 946 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 316%
Great: 370%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$89
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 183 186 186 185 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 182
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 184
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
334GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 125 126 127 129 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 50.1
Write 90.8
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 123
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
183% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
381GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 116 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 116
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$69
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 22.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 27.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82) Builds (Compare 2,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B460M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C82)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback