Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 12:59
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 165
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 251
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Acer(1025 1094) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
9.94% Terrible
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 12.6
10% 12.1 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 9
9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 71 92 68 34 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 463
Write 295
Mixed 323
SusWrite 84.8
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 33.6
140% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 194
168% 246 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S1MB-4 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 10
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback