Lenovo 82AK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82AK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210913
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 13:36
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 8cx
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 39.8
2-Core 61.9
33% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 155
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KLUEG8UHDB-C2D1 251GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 302 322 322 333 357 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
Read 408
Write 274
Mixed 278
SusWrite 324
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 15.8
43% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 88.1
DQ Mixed 103
77% 103 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB TSOP LPDDR4 1805 MHz clocked @ 1555 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.4% Good
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 26.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback