Today's hottest deals

Asus X555QG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X555QG  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555QG
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 07:50
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 106
48% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 166
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 13D0) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 9.9
7% 8.43 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 33 50 95 62 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 100
Write 103
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 59.4
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G085WB-BCPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555QG Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555QG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback