Today's hottest deals

Asus GL552JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL552JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552JX
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151222
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 17:30
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4750HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 110
51% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 245
28% 221 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 1A8D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23
Parallax 17.2
17% 20.3 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 14.8
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 110 80 66 62 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 428
Write 104
Mixed 162
SusWrite 84.5
42% 195 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 20.3
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 58.8
55% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2BC10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 94 84 90 64 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 88.1
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 81.4
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 14
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.5
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552JX Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback