Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI B360M Xtreme
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime22.2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 19:57
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 243
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 663
72% 570 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 0974) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 65.3
51% 67.2 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 57.2
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 258GB
52GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 424 404 401 410 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 348
Write 355
Mixed 324
SusWrite 410
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 29.1
103% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 188
166% 245 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83%
Great: 106%
Amd-raid WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 2.1 92 78 3.2 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 50.6
Write 1.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 45.6
18% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 153%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
552GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 135 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 115
Write 109
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 135
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback