Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HD R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 22:00
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 896
86% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 40.4
36% 42.2 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 28.3
29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2256G 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 431 436 447 444 445 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 436
Mixed 385
SusWrite 438
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 31.5
151% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 44.6
91% 178 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 98%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 5.8 7.5 6.5 5.6 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Read 9.3
Write 5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.7
10% 7.75 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HD R4.0 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback