Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 07:51
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 219
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 476
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 5.1
4% 13.5 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 5
Splatting 11
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
563GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 71 85 77 94 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 121
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 78.2
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 95%
SSK Storage 1TB
750GB free
Firmware: 0057
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 98 97 99 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 59.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 97
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback