Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 20:11
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$178
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 314
99% 186 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 933
94% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,130
70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 63.7
57% 67.7 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 65.8
54% 65.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 45 47 47 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 108%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
416GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 428 387 393 409 410 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 469
Mixed 390
SusWrite 407
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 48.2
171% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 251
203% 291 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 110%
Great: 117%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 173 172 174 174 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 164
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 172
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 172 174 175 175 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 173
Mixed 87
SusWrite 174
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 112%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 1621
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 3.7 1.9 5.4 3.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.9% Terrible
Read 35.6
Write 27.1
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.2
20% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
20% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.9%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2133C15-8GRR 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.4
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $831
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback