HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8592
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 20:53
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$68
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 350
43% 330 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 400E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 55
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 47.8
45% 52.7 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 44.4
37% 44.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H7 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H2Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,712
Write 1,324
Mixed 871
288% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 67
223% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 845
DQ Mixed 960
705% 925 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 244%
WD Green 750GB (2012)
626GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 114 114 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 113
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback