Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 23:25
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 205
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 632
62% 509 Pts
64-Core 840
52% 840 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.3% Above average
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 74.2
62% 75.1 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 58.9
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 298 307 308 315 309 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 502
Write 354
Mixed 300
SusWrite 305
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 34.5
116% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 198
169% 248 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87%
Great: 105%
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
494GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 383 372 370 371 371 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 465
Mixed 380
SusWrite 385
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 45.6
154% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 248
201% 283 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 105%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 136 137 141 141 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 131
Write 143
Mixed 101
SusWrite 137
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
522GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 99 101 102 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 99
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 2621 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 91 91 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 93.9
Write 85.3
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 90.2
113% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 62%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 180 179 179 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 175
Mixed 104
SusWrite 179
217% 165 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 1.1
432% 6.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 1.1
431% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
3TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 106 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 107
138% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
824GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 124 124 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 124
Write 121
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 124
159% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.1
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 28.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback