Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive490% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 18:02
Run Duration389 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$274
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 75.7
1-Core 217
2-Core 423
122% 239 Pts
4-Core 814
8-Core 1,575
142% 1,195 Pts
64-Core 2,962
183% 2,962 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
Gigabyte(1458 403B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 301
Reflection 298
Parallax 306
245% 302 fps
Gravity 245
Splatting 187
187% 216 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$331
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3669 3798 3939 3888 3934 3902 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
490% Outstanding
Read 1,869
Write 3,263
Mixed 2,015
SusWrite 3,855
626% 2,750 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 269
4K Mixed 83.3
313% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 2,209
DQ Write 1,575
DQ Mixed 1,841
1,389% 1,875 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 490%
Great: 500%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$331
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3627 3686 3592 3698 3699 3696 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
492% Outstanding
Read 1,772
Write 3,122
Mixed 1,952
SusWrite 3,666
599% 2,628 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 298
4K Mixed 98
354% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 2,281
DQ Write 1,718
DQ Mixed 1,915
1,455% 1,972 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 492%
Great: 500%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
166GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1643 1228 921 735 701 690 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,281
Write 2,094
Mixed 1,766
SusWrite 986
399% 1,782 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 99.7
330% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 2,221
DQ Write 1,533
DQ Mixed 1,762
1,347% 1,839 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 338%
Great: 435%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 384 384 381 378 378 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 406
Write 395
Mixed 372
SusWrite 381
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 28.9
95% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 122
98% 136 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 117 121 121 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 84.9
Write 124
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 116
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 68%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 16TB
568GB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 288 278 271 291 277 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 141
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 277
224% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
71% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C38 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 50.8
MC Mixed 51
148% 51.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 49.9
SC Mixed 28.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 136%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z690 EXTREME Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback