Dell OptiPlex 3020

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3020  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180618
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 18:21
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 369
51% 377 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07985
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 178 87 86 87 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 233
Write 216
Mixed 214
SusWrite 124
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 28
116% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 136
110% 155 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
274GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 98 97 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 88.6
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 97.5
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.4 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 12.2
Mixed 11
SusWrite 7.1
16% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 6GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3020 Builds (Compare 6,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback