Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400T 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 156 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 292 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 01DA) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6229 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	4.01% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 5.2 Parallax 6.4 5% 5.9 fps	MRender 9.3 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0 2% 3.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.01% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-CB256 256GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: GC8010A SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 242 247 280 301 276 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 430 Write 286 Mixed 298 SusWrite 256 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 31.5 106% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 29.3 DQ Write 69.6 DQ Mixed 37.9 32% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 97%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB 3,373 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 57GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 23 23 23 22 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 124 Write 28.4 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 22.4 56% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.6 170% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GKE400SO51216-2400 2x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.4% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 20.6 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	3x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1x

SSD
GP-ASM2NE2512GTTDR 512GBGigabyteBench 211%, 5,250 samples	1x
CV1-CB256 256GBLiteonBench 84%, 17 samples	1x
NT-64 64GBBench 56%, 43 samples	1x

RAM
SF464128CK8IWGKFEG 2x4GBUnknownBench 72%, 95 samples	1x
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 127 samples	1x
GKE400SO51216-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 69%, 3 samples	1x