Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 03:08
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 260
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 757
77% 625 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85% Excellent
Lighting 124
Reflection 135
Parallax 123
101% 127 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 128
Splatting 0.1
54% 74.5 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 111 108 110 106 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 460
Mixed 349
SusWrite 113
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 48.7
177% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 261
198% 268 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 93%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
588GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 19 26 29 23 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 36.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 25.6
17% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 28.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 24.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback