Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 164
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 388
43% 337 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 182
Parallax 189
152% 186 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 164
Splatting 135
134% 168 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 767 615 314 271 276 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,551
Write 829
Mixed 926
SusWrite 420
206% 932 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 21.6
106% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 191
222% 405 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 142%
Great: 276%
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
74GB free
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 156 144 145 146 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 455
Write 410
Mixed 352
SusWrite 151
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 18.1
90% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 27.2
36% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback