Lenovo 43532G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 43532G5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory247.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 755
68% 573 Pts
64-Core 1,991
123% 1,991 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.8% Below average
Lighting 43
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 42.8
35% 40.1 fps
MRender 55.9
Gravity 32
Splatting 22.5
28% 36.8 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDLF1DAM-400G-1JA2 400GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RE41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 223 224 226 223 222 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.5% Above average
Read 200
Write 227
Mixed 205
SusWrite 224
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 28.7
97% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 172
130% 173 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 73%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 400GB
198GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 368 368 369 365 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 466
Write 357
Mixed 288
SusWrite 367
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 24.2
82% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 167
134% 186 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 244%
VK0240GDJXU 240GB
106GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 226 226 226 224 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.5% Good
Read 234
Write 224
Mixed 186
SusWrite 225
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 28.8
109% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 185
137% 181 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
13GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 252
Write 238
Mixed 223
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 45.3
148% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 162
122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
40GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 66.6
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 69.6
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70... 256GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
146% Outstanding
MC Read 70.3
MC Write 56.2
MC Mixed 60.2
178% 62.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 146%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 43532G5 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 43532G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback