MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A31
MotherboardMSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 21:50
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,123
102% 855 Pts
64-Core 2,226
138% 2,226 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
MSI(1462 3952) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 248
Reflection 252
Parallax 504
202% 335 fps
MRender 389
Gravity 215
Splatting 290
242% 298 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 193%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
122GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1415 1181 1182 1181 1128 641 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,162
Write 1,802
Mixed 997
SusWrite 1,121
339% 1,521 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 73.3
293% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,474
DQ Write 1,131
DQ Mixed 1006
833% 1,204 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 302%
Great: 302%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
248GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 83 81 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 105
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 80.8
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
866GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 109 110 109 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 104
Write 91.5
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 108
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
533GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 74 71 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 77
Write 59.3
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 72.8
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 67%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 62 61 46 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 58.3
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
15GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 16 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 19.5
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 17.5
27% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 41.3
122% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 38.8
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 114%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback