Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 759 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 61.6 2-Core 116 54% 85.8 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 221 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 228 14% 228 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.95 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.04% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 1.1 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3 3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.04% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 114GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 28 32 34 37 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	30% Poor	Read 340 Write 45 Mixed 122 SusWrite 29.4 29% 134 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 8.6 33% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 28.9 DQ Mixed 30.7 40% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5773DH0-YK0 4x2GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.7% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17.2 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	99x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	82x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	64x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	43x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	39x
M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 67%, 378 samples	24x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $316