Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201127
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 16:34
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 106
2-Core 221
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 441
57% 428 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.14029.1011
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 18.9
0% 10.9 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 12.5
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 SATA III SSD 1TB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 31 44 42 18 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 222
Write 67.8
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 34.4
20% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 24.4
69% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 0.7
35% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AU008G-H3200GST 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
95% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 34.4
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 24.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback