Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3212CF7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3212CF7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130321
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 20:27
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 122
52% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 212
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.1% Below average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 92.8
Parallax 63
48% 71.6 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 0.2
16% 21 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7OAA30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 26 46 33 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 105
Write 86.5
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 40
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3212CF7 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 3212CF7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback