Today's hottest deals

Dell PowerEdge R6515

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell PowerEdge R6515
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R6515  (all builds)
Memory249.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 08:37
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 227
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 835
77% 645 Pts
64-Core 3,650
226% 3,650 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1417 1431 1435 1439 1435 1435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,119
Write 1,440
Mixed 881
SusWrite 1,432
327% 1,468 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 69.4
264% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 459
437% 709 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 290%
Great: 283%
Micron_5300_MTFD 960GB
884GB free
Firmware: U001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 480 480 480 480 480 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Read 342
Write 490
Mixed 342
SusWrite 477
94% 413 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 41.7
162% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 279
203% 263 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Micron_5300_MTFD 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: U001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 488 488 488 489 490 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 494
Mixed 355
SusWrite 487
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 42.2
168% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 278
203% 263 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393A4K40DB2-CTD 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 80CE80B380CE M393A4K40DB2-CTD 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 255GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 65.7
MC Mixed 62.8
173% 60.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 29.7
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 150%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback