Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3740 1,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 53.5 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 33.7 26% 34.7 Pts	4-Core 66.6 8-Core 61.4 9% 64 Pts	64-Core 65.2 4% 65.2 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 14ED) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3417 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HGST HTS 545050A7E680 500GB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 465GB free, PID 17f8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 103 103 105 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 106 Write 97.7 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 102 113% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 42%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 248GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 35GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 0.1 0.4 0.4 8.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 36.2 Write 26.7 Mixed 29 SusWrite 4.5 30% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 4.3 401% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 108%
Kingston DT 100 G2 32GB 278 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 27GB free, PID 1653 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 10 16 15 14 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	9.2% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 15.7 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 12.8 20% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1 72% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.2% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 8.6 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM