Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X7400PC_N7400PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X7400PC_N7400PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X7400PC
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 00:09
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 206
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 422
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 174C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 30
Parallax 22.5
15% 23.5 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 15
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
818GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1346 1254 1040 1400 1456 1426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,703
Write 1,318
Mixed 1,476
SusWrite 1,320
327% 1,454 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 77.8
241% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 689
475% 602 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 249%
Great: 421%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 776 710 799 833 826 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 654
Write 333
Mixed 414
SusWrite 787
123% 547 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 45.2
149% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 93.3
107% 181 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 18.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 13.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X7400PC_N7400PC Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X7400PC_N7400PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback