Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive1,061% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 135
2-Core 272
84% 159 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 1087
97% 819 Pts
64-Core 2,136
132% 2,136 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
ASRock(1849 5101) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 141
Parallax 184
96% 148 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 137
Splatting 95.5
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
743GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4304 1496 1497 1518 1513 1128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1,061% Outstanding
Read 8,176
Write 8,340
Mixed 8,231
SusWrite 1,909
1,495% 6,664 MB/s
4K Read 584
4K Write 471
4K Mixed 522
1,803% 526 MB/s
DQ Read 1,492
DQ Write 1147
DQ Mixed 1,336
995% 1,325 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 1,061%
Great: 255%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
211GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 795 101 73 22 12 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,446
Write 1,230
Mixed 991
SusWrite 197
215% 966 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 69.3
250% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 272
324% 558 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 178%
Great: 255%
Samsung 970 PRO 512GB
398GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 348 349 348 347 350 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 340
Write 348
Mixed 307
SusWrite 349
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 34.9
117% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 211
155% 202 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 357%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$175
2TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 191 196 195 195 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL32G36C16U4BL.M16FB CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBR BL32G36C16U4BL.M16FB CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBR 95GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.9% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 29.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 26.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $752
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback