Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_PC  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H61M-S2PV
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 11:00
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 346
48% 354 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 36.1
23% 31.8 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 30.2
29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 44 54 54 60 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 65.2
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 53.3
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 39%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB
351GB free, PID 17b7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 28 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 25.6
Mixed 20
SusWrite 26.4
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Kingston 9905403-500.A01LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_PC Builds (Compare 2,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback