Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 89.7 2-Core 163 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 235 30% 230 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 23.9 Parallax 18.4 15% 20.3 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 17.6 15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB 3,562 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0401A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 220 223 225 229 230 MB/s Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.9% Above average	Read 254 Write 227 Mixed 228 SusWrite 218 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 20.4 81% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 39 67% 128 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/4G 8502 1600 CL10 Series 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	14x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNNG 2x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 383 samples	7x
HY64C1C1624ZY 04CB HY64C1B0823ZY 6GBUnknownBench 47%, 90 samples	6x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/4G 8502 1600 CL10 Series 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 8 samples	5x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28