Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 06:05
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 662
72% 570 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 18.4
14% 18 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.6
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1363 895 247 169 183 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,237
Write 1,573
Mixed 1,314
SusWrite 503
261% 1,157 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 67.5
224% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,240
DQ Write 741
DQ Mixed 1,013
748% 998 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 194%
Great: 295%
Plextor PX-256M7VC 256GB
29GB free
Firmware: 1.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 214 277 237 228 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 410
Mixed 354
SusWrite 251
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 42.1
141% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 294
232% 324 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 103%
WDC WD20EFAX-68B2RN1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 158 157 156 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 174
Write 147
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 157
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 1.1
57% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1.7
3% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 117 108 116 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 59.2
Write 77.5
Mixed 15.1
SusWrite 116
48% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
26% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
806GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 188 185 187 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 136
Mixed 76
SusWrite 187
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
949GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 136 135 138 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 92.4
Write 101
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 136
62% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-027.A00G 99U5702-095.A00G 9905702-027.A00G 99U5702-095.A00G 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 28.7
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 24.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback