Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 01:16
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 157
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 266
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 38.9
31% 39.4 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39
Splatting 27.5
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qnix 256GB 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 40 136 11 11 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 97.9
Write 16.2
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 67.6
13% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 17.1
91% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 99.5
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 39.3
73% 139 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 93%
USB DISK USB 8GB
7GB free, PID 1664
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.6 3.2 2.9 2.8 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 3.7
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 3.3
7% 6.12 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback