| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3062-A1 |
| Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120719 |
| Uptime | 22.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 26 '22 at 11:08 |
| Run Duration | 215 Seconds |
| Run User | EST-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.9%
Good
|
62% 103 Pts
|
43% 347 Pts
|
24% 382 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon R7 350X
Dell(1028 0081) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
|
2.38%
Terrible
|
0% 7.77 fps
|
7% 8.37 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.01H16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 31 37 36 35 33 MB/s
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
21% 28.1 MB/s
|
34% 0.4 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
96GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 97 89 98 99 MB/s
|
73.6%
Very good
|
83% 115 MB/s
|
127% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ramaxel RMR1881ED58E9W1600 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.3%
Average
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
53% 75.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO P900 Builds (Compare 214 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 84x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 67x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 39x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 54x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 22x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 18x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $279 |