Acer Aspire ES1-524

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-524  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Tricera_BS
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 13:46
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9410 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 54
2-Core 81.2
41% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 83.3
8-Core 82.2
11% 82.8 Pts
64-Core 81.2
5% 81.2 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Acer(1025 1087) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 5.2
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.33.S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 54 63 62 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 380
Write 64.1
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 58.8
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 10.2
68% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 22.1
34% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
582GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 84 82 83 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 89.3
Write 99
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 81.9
55% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingmax FSGF63F-D8 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ES1-524 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-524

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback