HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 18:14
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 381
51% 383 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-256G-1006 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 348 374 367 376 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 414
Write 375
Mixed 237
SusWrite 366
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 33.9
119% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 149
155% 255 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
931GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 127 128 127 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 121
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 126
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback