MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive435% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220520
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 21:06
Run Duration509 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$241
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 176
2-Core 300
105% 190 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 1175
108% 902 Pts
64-Core 2305
143% 2305 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Asus(1043 886E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
199% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 267
Parallax 322
233% 292 fps
MRender 357
Gravity 240
Splatting 183
204% 260 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 199%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2998 3239 3243 2299 1639 1707 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
435% Outstanding
Read 2,759
Write 3,386
Mixed 3,058
SusWrite 2,521
663% 2,931 MB/s
4K Read 81.5
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 116
376% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,359
DQ Write 1,029
DQ Mixed 1,158
876% 1,182 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 435%
Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
778GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3276 3307 3291 2411 1557 1605 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
432% Outstanding
Read 2,722
Write 3,316
Mixed 3,014
SusWrite 2,574
657% 2,906 MB/s
4K Read 80.3
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 108
356% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,405
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,209
912% 1,227 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 432%
Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3317 3326 3280 3325 3326 3296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
477% Outstanding
Read 2,725
Write 3,303
Mixed 3,022
SusWrite 3,312
700% 3,091 MB/s
4K Read 77.3
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 107
352% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,407
DQ Write 1,106
DQ Mixed 1,230
928% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 477%
Great: 508%
WDC WD8001FZBX-00ASYA0 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 241 243 242 242 243 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 226
Write 235
Mixed 114
SusWrite 242
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.7
10% 4.17 MB/s
DQ Read 2.9
DQ Write 8.2
DQ Mixed 6.2
5% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 28%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 188 189 187 189 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 182
Mixed 99.2
SusWrite 188
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.9
274% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A3 16TB
14.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 205 210 205 212 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 200
Mixed 159
SusWrite 208
262% 193 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 2.6
433% 6.2 MB/s
DQ Read 3.1
DQ Write 8.7
DQ Mixed 2.2
382% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 57.7
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 43
138% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 32.8
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 43.3
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback