Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-X9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15-X9  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190423
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 20:16
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 89.3
41% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 304
29% 240 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 1658) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 30
Parallax 7.3
6% 14.7 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKW010T8 1TB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 966 992 972 978 967 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,982
Write 1,142
Mixed 1,147
SusWrite 954
291% 1,307 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 51.9
170% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 469
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 404
306% 412 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 209%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 25.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 15-X9 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-X9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback